1/20/2024 0 Comments Scapple keys![]() Alternatively you can go to Scrivener/Scapple ▸ Enter Licence. If you have lost your registration details for either program, you can retrieve them using our Lost Licence Recovery page.Īfter you install the application on the second Mac, it will open in trial mode until you click on Enter Licence to input your registration details. If you purchased from our website, all you need to do is download Scrivener or Scapple, install it as described in our installation instructions article, then use your email address and your existing licence code to activate. For more detailed instructions, see Installing Scrivener for macOS (Mac App Store Edition). You can view your account and click on the download icon next the application that you want to install. You will need to be signed in to the store with the same Apple ID. If you purchased Scrivener or Scapple from Apple through the App Store then you will need to install the software on the additional Mac via the App Store app. Our licences are only valid for a single platform, so if you have a licence for the Mac version, it cannot be used to install Scrivener on a Windows computer. If you purchased from Apple's Mac App Store, you will need to review their EULA. Going with either approach means accepting the disadvantages of that choice.To check that you can install Scrivener or Scapple on another Mac without purchasing an additional licence, please review the terms of the End User Licence Agreement. For many, maybe even the majority, the benefits tip on the side of the database. The differences make the difference between the approaches a useful dichotomy to consider. And speed - everything is loaded in a usable format whereas files have to be loaded before any processing.īut also disbenefits - they're rigid, you can only do what the program does databases corrupt export may not be as robust as you thought, especially if development is rapid. There are additional benefits, such as only having one file to backup. In theory, a database can provide any feature that a program using files has. Not that any markdown is really pure.Īnd exports from programs like Roam need a lot of work to convert to useful files - and that is likely to increase as Roam continues to add features. The file based programs aren't pure either as they all prefer wikilinks. In practice, databases don't use pure markdown (although they may attempt to export it ). Here you are introducing caveats specifying things to be watched for in a database. It may not help others choose tools as a heuristic for evaluation and decision, but it's certainly a valid have you played with mind mapping tools? I would imagine so, but don't they work exactly like "Scapple"? Only some are way more mature than it sounds like it is currently. In the end whatever helps you be productive is great. That kind of foundational limit will pretty severely restrict your choices, but that's OK if you understand and accept the trade-offs, if that specific value is important enough to you. Or is rooted in a more abstract value or moral stance such as unwillingness (perhaps reasonable) to trust a company with your data under any circumstances. It may simply come down simply to it "feels right". Which is part of why I want to know these specific advantages and use cases for external tools operating on text files. if it's using an open DB format and/or all content is markdown and it has a robust exporter). It is definitely more useful IMO to state specific roots of concern that *may* arise from those two paradigms, such as "data ownership" (not a given with a DB, e.g. That's OK, it is enough that it *is* important to you, clearly.Īs far as general advice about how to choose a tool(set) in the current landscape, I maintain my position that "database vs. I'm really interested in specific benefits of direct text editing, but so far I am hearing *that* it is useful and important to you, but not much about *why*. I'm thinking of going primitive, with discursion into zettelkastenĪNyway, probably not super helpful. With the bubbles and colors, it is very fast and easy to understand an idea, relative to reading linear text. But you can't do that with a real zettel anyway. NOthing to search, nothing linked, no tags, etc. Unfortunately, it doesn't have any extra features. But I have been using it similar to how a zettel works, which is one scapple file per thought. You write in bubbles and connect them, that's it. But it has rekindled my writing projects, and I've been writing a lot.Īnd you know what is sticking? This program called Scapple. None of these methods are sticking for me. ![]() I've been working through all this notetaking business with markdown the past year, trying it all out, seeing what sticks, etc.this entire thread.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |